Using the case as a jumping off point, Dan Solove at Concurring Opinions raises a troublesome issue:
This case illustrates how our criminal justice system punishes the innocent more harshly than the guilty.It's frightening, but true. How may times have we had an execution that nobody will stop because the condemned won't "admit what he did"? On a more industrial level, the Sentencing Guidelines, as Solove points out, encourage guilty pleas and punish going to trial.
Some type of systemic reform is necessary, but it's not really clear what it should be. Eliminate guilty pleas? Do away with sentencing benefits for pleading guilty? I don't know. But before anything changes, more people will have to start caring about the problem. I won't hold my breath in anticipation.
No comments:
Post a Comment