Yesterday's Washington Post had good coverage of the oral argument in the consent-to-search case I mentioned here. It sounds like the Court is at least split over whether the Georgia appellate courts correctly held that once one resident of a house says "no, you can't search my house," the cops can't seek another answer from someone else. Hell, even Justice Thomas asked a question this time!
Meanwhile, Dahlia Lithwick over at Slate has these thoughts on the case.
Thursday, November 10, 2005
He Said, She Said, They Searched (Redux)
Posted by JD Byrne at 1:51 PM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment